Search for: "Eli Kaufman"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2012, 9:22 am
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) This week, the Seventh Circuit issued a decision in Schaffer-Larose v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 5:46 am
Anti-railroad sentiment helps to explain why the state of Missouri enacted one of the first laws placing responsibility on railroad corporations for fires caused by trains, a law mentioned in Hall, Finkelman, and Ely under the "The Active State and the Mixed Economy, 1812-1860. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 7:36 am
Kaufman's story of sudden weight gain and deadly heart disease is not an unusual one for a shockingly high percentage of people who take Zyprexa to help them manage bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:02 pm
Here's where we are so far. 2:04: Elie here. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 4:40 pm
Cox and Emma Kaufman (132 Yale Law Journal 1769 (2023)) Standards and the Law by Cary Coglianese (2 Standardization: Journal of Research and Innovation 15 (2023)) Toward Regulatory Isolationism? [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
The doctrine of collateral estoppel has two requirements: (1) “the identical issue necessarily must have been decided in the prior action and be decisive of the present action,” and (2) “the party to be precluded from relitigating the issue must have had a full and fair opportunity to contest the prior determination” (Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449, 455 [1985]; see Ackman v Haberer, 111 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2013]). [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
“The party seeking the benefit of collateral estoppel has the burden of demonstrating the identity of the issues in the present litigation and the prior determination, whereas the party attempting to defeat its application has the burden of establishing the absence of a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior action” (Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449, 456 [1985]). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:28 am
Since the issue was actually and necessarily decided in the arbitration, in which CISEF had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue, CISEF and the other plaintiffs, who are admittedly in privity with it, are precluded from relitigating it herein (see Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449, 455 [1985]; Active Media Servs., Inc. v Grant Prideco, Inc., 35 AD3d 165 [2006]). [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Goldberg, Eli Goldston Professor of Law, Harvard Law School --Benjamin Cardozo and The Death of the Common LawMark A. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:34 pm
As the Court of Appeals has decisively stated in Kaufman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
