Search for: "Elsevier Ltd."
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2016, 4:39 pm
Follow up to previous posting, Controversy over free journal access database keeps Sci-Hub in legal and research spotlight – Via TorrentFreak – PDF copy of Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery – Elsevier Inc., Elsevier B.V., and Elsevier Ltd. v Sci-Hub d/b/a ww.sci-hub.org, The Library Genesis Project d/b/a Libgen.org., Alexandra Elbakyan, John Does 1-99. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
By Eric Goldman Elsevier Ltd v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 2:47 pm
The combined Wiley-Blackwell will publish over 1,200 scholarly journals, putting it right behind Reed Elsevier and Springer in terms of numbers of journals published. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
By Eric Goldman with comments from Venkat Elsevier, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:00 am
From today's Out of the Jungle Blog"This week's Chronicle of Higher Education reports another merger that will likely have huge repercussions for librarians and researchers--John Wiley & Sons is purchasing Blackwell Publishing Ltd. for approximately $1.13 billion.The combined Wiley-Blackwell will publish over 1,200 scholarly journals, putting it right behind Reed Elsevier and Springer in terms of numbers of journals published. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
In November 2006, Merry Chance Industries Ltd. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:21 am
Full decision on ScribD, Elsevier Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:13 pm
Here's the abstract: This is an entry on the Regulation of Subprime and Predatory Lending for THE INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HOUSING AND HOME (Elsevier Ltd, 2010). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 3:54 am
” Based on this ruling, Morrill couldn’t present further evidence to keep the copyright claim alive.Inside Higher Ed reports that the American Chemical Society and Elsevier are again suing academic the 'networking site' ResearchGate in an another attempt to block the wesbite from posting copyrighted research paper. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
., Ltd., 797 F.3d 1332, 116 USPQ2d 1262, 1267 (Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
Jonathan Hayes, and the case page for Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
F.C. 20 December, 2018 Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited [2019] FCA 751 (stream ripping sites) S.A.S Elsevier et al v S.A. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:25 pm
Darling Kindersley Ltd., 448 F.3d 605, 613 (2d Cir. 2006). [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
Judgment is awaited from the UK Supreme Court as to whether software supplied electronically as a download and not on any tangible medium is goods for the purposes of the Commercial Agents Regulations (Computer Associates (UK) Ltd v The Software Incubator Ltd). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:12 am
It carried comments from the Claimant himself, critics and supporters, and a representative of Elsevier. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am
Judgment is pending in the CJEU on a referral from the UK Supreme Court asking whether software supplied electronically as a download and not on any tangible medium constitutes goods and/or a sale for the purposes of the Commercial Agents Regulations (C-410/19Computer Associates (UK) Ltd v The Software Incubator Ltd). [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
HTC (The Prior Art) (Ars Technica) (IPKat) US Copyright President Obama discusses three strikes anti-piracy law (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions Supreme Court: Registration requirement of 411(a) not jurisdictional for copyright claims: Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
HTC (The Prior Art) (Ars Technica) (IPKat) US Copyright President Obama discusses three strikes anti-piracy law (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions Supreme Court: Registration requirement of 411(a) not jurisdictional for copyright claims: Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
* Paywalls and Robin Hoods: the tale of Elsevier and Sci-Hub.orgFrom guest contributor Emma Perot comes this appraisal of a dispute between a giant publisher of valuable and useful scholarly material on the one hand, and those who seek access to that same information on the other. [read post]
