Search for: "Eurostar Inc"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Eurostar, Inc., the court held that a correct, yet incomplete, meal break policy does not support class certification, absent other evidence suggesting that common, rather than individual, issues predominate. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Eurostar, Inc., the court held that a correct, yet incomplete, meal break policy does not support class certification, absent other evidence suggesting that common, rather than individual, issues predominate. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
Sage Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 9:48 pm
Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed: Fall Hazard Prompts NHTSA, CPSC and Dorel Juvenile Group to Announce Recall of Infant Car Seat/Carriers Name of product: Dorel Infant Car Seat/Carriers Units: About 447,000 Manufacturer: Dorel Juvenile Group Inc., of Columbus, Ind. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:03 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke v R [2012] EWCA Crim 9 (20 January 2012) Oliver, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3114 (21 December 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3129 (16 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civi Division) Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2012) Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2012) Charnock & Ors v Rowan & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 2 (20 January 2012) … [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:22 am
The company also owes Paul Winston-Eurostar LLC $.19 million and two affiliates of Jay Gems Inc. about $950,000. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm
See Eurostar Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:28 am
[W]hile Section 18 allows the Board to consider claims it could not entertain in an opposition under Section 13 or a cancellation under Section 14, for example, a restriction in a concurrent use case, or the entry of a modification to an identification of goods where the modification would avoid a likelihood of confusion, it does not change the statutory basis for cancellation where a valid ground for cancellation exists, such as a partial abandonment under Section 14, as is the case here.And so the… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Respondent again moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under FRCP 12(b)(6).The Board reviewed the requirements for Section 18 partial cancellation, as set out in Eurostar Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:30 am
Merck & Co., 46 USPQ2d 1478, 1479 (TTAB 1998) (citing Eurostar Inc. v. [read post]
