Search for: "FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 2:19 pm by Lawrence Solum
Fox Television Stations, Inc., in which the Supreme Court affirmed a change of FCC policy to the effect that even isolated, non-repetitive incidents of indecent speech could be sanctioned. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:15 pm
Fox Television Stations, Inc. that the FCC has the power to regulate even the briefest expletives which are aired on television stations, but declined to rule whether this power violated the 1st Amendment. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
Fox Television Stations, Inc. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Joseph Tomain
Fox Television Stations, Inc. nears, a brief history of indecency regulation may be of interest and begins with a tie to music. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:11 pm
Stations, Inc., No. 07-582 In an appeal from an FCC order finding language used on a television broadcast indecent in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1464, the Court of Appeals’ order vacating the agency’s order is reversed where the FCC’s action was neither arbitrary nor [...] [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:50 am
Divided three-judge Second Circuit panel holds that FCC's new policy regarding "fleeting expletives" is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act: You can access today's ruling in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
  In this case, called Federal Communications Commission v Fox Television Stations, Inc., the Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which had found the FCC decision to be arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:55 pm
Yesterday, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its decision in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:46 am
  Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:31 am by David Oxenford
Fox Television Stations, Inc, dealing with "fleeting expletives", upholding the more rigorous enforcement of the FCC's indecency rules begun under FCC Chairman Kevin Martin as being justified under administrative law procedures, but not addressing the constitutional issue as to whether the FCC's indecency policy could be constitutionally justified. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:13 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., which upholds the FCC's "fleeting expletives" rule against an administrative law challenge. [read post]