Search for: "FLUOR DANIEL, INC."
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 12:47 pm
Fluor Daniel, Inc. (2002 WL 246439, E.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAlternative Dispute ResolutionCourt Confirms Partial Arbitral Award to Extent Award Is Final Solution of Severable Claims Matter of Fluor Daniel Intercontinental Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
The parties were free to bargain for “no lien” subcontracts, essentially waiving the right to a mechanic’s lien up front; Duke/Fluor Daniel v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 9:14 pm
Their complaint also names four premise owners, Dupont, Chevron, Texaco, and Exxon Mobile, as well as the following contractors that he claims provided the material that contained asbestos, Bechtel, Able Supply, Daniel International, HP Zachary, and Fluor, as defendants. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:43 pm
Earlier environmental qui tam cases include a whistleblower win of $4.1 million against Westinghouse Hanford Co. and Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., alleging contractors overcharged the DOE for cleanup at Hanford Nuclear Reservation in a $240 million case; and a $4.2 million case involving misrepresenting the progress of nuclear cleanup at Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant by Rockwell International. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Marcionese issued his decision Sept. 29, 2008. *** Fluor Daniel, Inc. (15-CA-12544, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 79) Baton Rouge, LA Jan. 27, 2009. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
" Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Asbestos Workers Local 84 (DST Insulation, Inc [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:43 pm
Earlier environmental qui tam cases include a whistleblower win of $4.1 million against Westinghouse Hanford Co. and Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., alleging contractors overcharged the DOE for cleanup at Hanford Nuclear Reservation in a $240 million case; and a $4.2 million case involving misrepresenting the progress of nuclear cleanup at Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant by Rockwell International. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:43 pm
Earlier environmental qui tam cases include a whistleblower win of $4.1 million against Westinghouse Hanford Co. and Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., alleging contractors overcharged the DOE for cleanup at Hanford Nuclear Reservation in a $240 million case; and a $4.2 million case involving misrepresenting the progress of nuclear cleanup at Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant by Rockwell International. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:43 pm
Earlier environmental qui tam cases include a whistleblower win of $4.1 million against Westinghouse Hanford Co. and Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., alleging contractors overcharged the DOE for cleanup at Hanford Nuclear Reservation in a $240 million case; and a $4.2 million case involving misrepresenting the progress of nuclear cleanup at Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant by Rockwell International. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
. *** Fluor Daniel, Inc. (15-CA-12544, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 15) Baton Rouge, LA Sept. 25, 2008. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Fluor Daniel Corp., 222 F. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Ken Feinberg, speaking at a symposium on mass torts, asks what legal challenges do mass torts confront in the federal courts. [read post]
