Search for: "Farkas, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 7:24 am by Nathan Koppel
Farkas had pleaded not guilty to the charges and plans to appeal the sentence. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm by Jacqueline Palank
Farkas prays that the court stay any forfeiture of this asset pending Farkasappeals being exhausted. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:59 am by Mandelman
According to the AP story: Farkas’ attorney, Bruce Rogow, said he was disappointed in the verdict and plans to appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:24 pm by Brian Shiffrin
DuBrin, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn People v Farkas (_NY_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01318 [2/22/11]), the Court of Appeals decided a very important 30.30 case - against the defendant- but in so ruling confirmed principles that will often help defendants seeking to move to dismiss a superseding accusatory on 30.30 grounds. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:09 am
"Case Western Reserve University continues effort to revoke a doctor's degree in federal appeals court": Karen Farkas had this article in June 2014 in The Cleveland Plain Dealer. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:26 am
The First Department noted the recent Court of Appeals decisions in Miceli v State Farm Mut. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm
Farkas, who was convicted by a jury of numerous criminal counts, conspiracy to bank fraud, wire fraud, and securities fraud, is accused of making $40 million from the scam. [read post]
Editor’s Note: The following post is based on a Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP memorandum by Victor Lewkow, Janet Fisher, and Esther Farkas. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Farkas of Cleveland’s Frantz Ward firm for alerting me to this decision.Filed under: Attorney-Client Privilege, Work Product Doctrine Tagged: appealability, attorney-client privilege, Bunham v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Farkas of Cleveland’s Frantz Ward firm for alerting me to this decision.Filed under: Attorney-Client Privilege, Work Product Doctrine Tagged: appealability, attorney-client privilege, Bunham v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:42 am by Paul Kirgis
 Contact Brian Farkas at brian.farkas@law.cardozo.yu.edu [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other candidates who have not yet paid the qualifying fee include: Alexcia Cox, Adam Farkas, Gregg Lerman, Rolando Silva, and Samuel Stern.Also in the 15th Circuit, Public Defender Carey Haughwout is also not running for reelection. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
Now it's the turn of Roland Mallinson to add his weight to Thomas's, with the following analysis:I agree with your poster, Thomas Farkas -- as he did with my earlier one commenting on the Advocate General’s opinion (here). [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:35 am
  See Police Dog Handler can be Liable by Karen Farkas, The Plain Dealer, Mar. 7, 2007. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:06 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Gray and Millsap contend that the success of Houston’s land-use reform was a product not only of the reform’s substantive merits, but also of its appeal to one of the greatest opponents of new housing development: homeowners. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Such was not a determination on the merits and thus res judicata does not apply to bar commencement of another action based on the same transactions (see Sclafani v Story Book Homes, 294 AD2d 559; Matter of Farkas v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]