Search for: "Fastenal IP Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 4:56 am
” The federal district court in Chicago properly determined trade dress for the design of conveyer belt fasteners owned by Flexible Steel Lacing Company (Flexco) was invalid as functional and could not be asserted against a competing fastener manufacturer, the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:06 am
At that time the company's product, still based on hooks and eyes, was called the "C-curity Fastener". [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:39 pm
If you have come across an interesting or innovative issued patent, new or old, and would like the IP community to know about it, please contact the Web and Blog Editor. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
General Electric Company, et al. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Senators Specter and Leahy express concern about ACTA Treaty (Techdirt) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Justice) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Intellectual Property Watch) Commerce Department cites questionable stats, Chamber of Commerce uses them to ask Bush to sign PRO IP Bill into law (Techdirt)… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
Rome Fastener (Patently-O) CAFC: En Banc request denied on issue of inequitable conduct by non-inventor CEO: Avid ID v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:46 am
Nearly everyone in the IP community is talking about the hilarious viral Velcro music video released last week. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 am
As you can imagine, many of these businesses involve IP as a major component of the business. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
PART 1: IP ISSUES CURRENTLY PENDING BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT In the first part of our series, we briefly summarize the intellectual property issues that the Supreme Court has already agreed to address in 2020. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:49 pm
Assigned to Avago Technologies Wireless IP, Pte. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 5:21 am
More concretely, this means it is more important than ever for foreign companies to do sufficient due diligence on their Chinese manufacturers (both new and existing) and to protect themselves with good contracts and IP registrations. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 8:26 pm
The opening verse of Velcro’s video goes as follows: We’re a company that’s so successful that everywhere you go You see a scratchy, hairy fastener and you say, “Hey, that’s Velcro! [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 8:26 pm
The opening verse of Velcro’s video goes as follows: We’re a company that’s so successful that everywhere you go You see a scratchy, hairy fastener and you say, “Hey, that’s Velcro! [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
IP Holdings LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Given Brundle's success, the company was duly entitled to an award of costs. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
In situations where the company knows it will be selling its product in China right away, it needs to analyze the options set forth by IP Dragon above. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,824,718 entitled PROCESS OF MAKING A FIBROUS ELECTRET WEB and owned by3M Innovative Properties Company. [read post]
