Search for: "Federal Bakers, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2018, 12:30 am by Joseph Arshawsky
Baker Hughes Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1141, 18 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 9:24 pm by Patent Docs
Adam Banks of Weil, Scott Kamholz of Covington & Burling, and Eliot Williams of Baker Botts will focus on the substantial and fast-moving legal activity unleased by the Federal Circuit's decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is Baker Hughes Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm by Andrew Ramonas
Johnson is working on the account with Baker shareholder Lance Leggitt, chairman of the firm’s federal health policy group, as well as senior public policy advisers Jennifer Summa and Laine Glisson Oliver. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:11 am
Houston-based oil field services provider Baker Hughes Inc. on Thursday announced that it has agreed to pay $44.1 million to settle the Department of Justice and the SEC's long-standing allegations that a unit of the company had violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Race Tires America, Inc., which presents the Supreme Court with the opportunity to resolve an important conflict among the federal courts over the scope of recoverable costs associated with the production of electronic documents during discovery. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:26 am by Stefanie Levine
Baker & Daniels’ Trevor Carter, a Practice Center Contributor, recently passed along this article that he co-authored with colleague Andrew McCoy on the August 6th Federal Circuit decision, Ring Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:52 am by Jonathan Bailey
The post 3 Count: Music Inc. appeared first on Plagiarism Today. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:33 am by John Jascob
Smith & Wesson, Inc., July 13, 2022, Lynch, S.).SOX Section 1514A is the whistleblower protection provision, which limits protection to whistleblower claims about “a violation of section 1341, 1343, 1344, or 1348, any rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
 A federal district court must still follow Baker. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
Federal Trade Commission Jennifer Tempesta of Baker Botts, LLP will address the judicial and administrative activity that has occurred since the Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in FTC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 9:46 am by Nolan and Auerbach
The United States is intervening in a whistleblower suit that alleges that Community Health Systems Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
” The Federal Court of Appeal in Salt Canada Inc. v. [read post]