Search for: "Federal National Mortgage Association v. Chance" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2013, 10:52 pm by Rich Vetstein
Federal National Mortgage Association, 462 Mass. 569 (2012), applies to cases that were pending on appeal at the time that case was decided. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
MishkinIt looks like the court is finally set to rule on the CFPB’s motion to dismiss in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm by Jennings, Strouss & Salmon
Background In the current economic environment, national banks and federal savings associations (collectively, banks) are facing challenges resulting from unprecedented numbers of troubled residential mortgage loans. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am by Lyle Denniston
 They asked the Court to spell out when a federal court has the authority to decide a case against “Fannie Mae” — the Federal National Mortgage Association. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Florida National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
CVSG Federal National Mortgage Association v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Caulkett, No. 13-1421 (lower court opinion here: https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/14-10803/14-10803-2014-05-21.pdf); and Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly:    At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
McHughDocket: 10-638Issue(s): Whether the claims of a dual-status National Guard technician alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are jurisdictionally barred by the doctrine of Feres v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Mortgage Bankers Association 13-1041Issue: Whether a federal agency must engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act before it can significantly alter an interpretive rule that articulates an interpretation of an agency regulation. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
Mortgage Bankers Association, in which the Court is considering whether an agency must engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking before significantly changing an interpretative rule. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
EdwardsDocket: 10-708Issue(s): 1) Whether, under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 - which prohibits any referral fee for business incident to a real estate settlement service involving a federal-related mortgage loan, and holds any violator of this provision liable to the person charged for the settlement service - a private purchaser of real estate settlement services has standing to sue in federal court absent any claim that the alleged violation… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
Mortgage Bankers Association, 13-1041, and Nickols v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
And yet this week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Baze v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  The Court called for the Solicitor General’s views in Federal National Mortgage Association v. [read post]