Search for: "Fictitious Defendant #1" Results 1 - 20 of 603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
By Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law   California Code of Civil Procedure allows fictitious defendants, that is, naming unknown defendants, which you will commonly see in a caption (such as “Doe 1? [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
  Table of Contents   Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:47 am
Defendant's use of a fictitious name to ship a package of drugs was manifested a lack of an expectation of privacy in the package. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Bank N.A. and Does 1 through 25 (yet to be named or fictitious defendants). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:29 pm by Allison Tussey
The value of the fraudulent loans involved in the loan participation scheme was in excess of $1 million. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It cannot necessarily be assumed that the defendant was merely creating a fictitious payee without intending a criminal design. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:44 pm by Matthew Reisig
Defense Attorney For Forgery And Related Offenses (N.J.S.A. 2C:21-1) Charges Forgery (N.J.S.A. 2C:21-1) is the act of creating, altering, executing, or otherwise putting forth writings that purport to be the act of another, who did not authorize such use, or a fictitious person. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:06 am
Florida man pleads guilty to wire fraud for scheme to defraud investors with claims of successful commodities trading / Solicited more than $1 million in investments – used more than $280,000 for own expenses (DOJ Release)SEC Charges Founder of Purported Blockchain Marketplace for Fraudulent ICO (SEC Release)SEC Files Charges Against Scheme to Sell Fictitious Interests in Marijuana Company (SEC Release)Asheville Man Pleads Guilty To Securities Fraud And Money Laundering For… [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:58 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore sues said DOE Defendants by fictitious names. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
On November 1, 2023, all counsel appeared in person before the Court for oral argument on the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants W. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:09 pm
The 9th went on to clarify that the government had to prove two elements in this offense: (1) the document appeared to be for identification and appeared to be issued by the U.S.; and (2) the defendant knew the document was stolen or produced without U.S. authority. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:16 am
A dog sniff of a postal package in Pittsburgh was conducted after Postal Inspectors there were alerted the package was coming by Postal Inspectors in Los Angeles, with a fictitious return address. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
The Court held that in order to find a defendant guilty under the federal threat statute, he must transmit a communication with either (1) the purpose of issuing a threat, or (2) with knowledge that the communication will be viewed as a threat. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
Defendant is charged with obtaining the transit authority vendor assignments for his company by using a fictitious name. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:12 am
August 25, 2011).* Just because defendant used fictitious names to set up cell phone accounts did not ipso facto deprive him of standing to contest a seizure and search of the phones. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:31 pm by Walter Olson
“Notice that it was left to the defendants to investigate? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:03 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 When he finally admitted a year after filing suit that he was not Ortiz, but Santiago, the Circuit Court denied defendants' motion to dismiss, but certified a two part question: (1) did the trial court have to dismiss as a sanction for deliberately filing a complaint using a fictitious name; and (2) if not, could the plaintiff's second amended complaint, providing his real name, be dismissed as time barred on the grounds that it could not relate back to… [read post]