Search for: "Fictitious Defendants A, B, C and D"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Kneen, No. 16-cv-00882-PAB-STV, 2017 BL 332704 (D. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
§2B1.1(b)(11)(C), because this provision does not apply to personal tax returns. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
It is acknowledged that the Claimants and Defendants are not parties to any contract with one another. [29] Section 3(1) of the Small Claims Act provides that this court has jurisdiction to hear claims within the court’s monetary limit of $25,000 that are for: (a) debt or damages; (b) recovery of personal property; (c) specific performance of an agreement relating to personal property or services; or (d) relief from opposing claims to personal property. [30]… [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:12 am
Sept. 30, 2022) Plaintiff, d/b/a Logan Car Service, has offered limousine and transportation services primarily in the Greater Boston area since the 2000s and uses logancarservice.com to do so. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 6:17 pm
This is acute because the way in which the facts of a case are narrated determines to a large part the outcome of that case.The flipside of the meaning of fiction as noted above is the fictitious, as the act of pretending, and even willfully deceiving in order to produce a false belief. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
§1446(c)(2)(B) specifically addressing this issue). [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:22 pm
(b) No particular form of notice is required, but it shall notify the defendant of the legal basis of the claim and the type of loss sustained, including with specificity the nature of the injuries suffered. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
” B. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
As an April post here noted, some people have been trying to get Google to deindex mainstream news articles — hide them from searchers by removing them from Google indexes — by (a) suing the people quoted in the articles, (b) getting stipulations from the people recanting their allegations, (c) getting court orders based on those recantations, and then (d) submitting those orders to Google. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
Columbia Law School Professor John C. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:25 pm
It provides as follows:Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section… [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:14 am
The FBI can pose as Al Qaeda or ISIS operatives and trick a homegrown violent extremist into becoming an international terrorist based on contact with wholly fictitious terrorists. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:12 am
B. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:12 am
B. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As my article notes, courts do make exceptions to the litigate-in-your-own-name rule, and there are plausible arguments that pseudonymous litigation should be more commonly allowed; but this is still a good articulation of the dominant view: Pilots X, Y, Z, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, & M sued Boeing about its 737 MAX airplanes. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:32 am
Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:04 pm
The Dallas paper has this summary of the new rule:As written, the rule states that lawyers (a) won’t condition representation on having a client engage in sexual relations, (b) won’t solicit sex as payment of fees and (c) won’t have sex with someone the lawyer is personally representing unless the sexual relationship is consensual and began before the attorney-client relationship began. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
CRE 901(b)(1). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
§ 14-208.40A(d)-(e) to resolve the issue. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
In July 2013, defendants filed an offer of judgment in the amount of $475,000 to settle the case. [read post]
