Search for: "Ford v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
Today's opinion from the Fourth Appellate District, Division One, in San Diego holds Ford waived any claim to a new trial based on its argument that that the jury improperly imposed punitive damages to punish Ford for harm caused to nonparties.In the third of three recent California appellate decisions to confront the fallout from the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
Ford had appealed the jury's award, arguing that the punitive damage award was improper in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:17 am by Christopher Bird
The Supreme Court of Canada rejected this standard in Hill v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 9:00 am by theadm
The case is Rayanne Regmund Chesser, Gloria Janssen, Michael Newberry and Carol Newberry v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:16 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Ford Motor Company The post South Carolina Plant Employee Was “User” of Product for Sodium Bromate for Purposes of Strict Product Liability Analysis – Lawing v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:47 am by Walter Olson
Ford (3) Update: My mother, the car (6) Update: Mohr v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:33 pm
Affected vehicles include the 2005-2008 Element, the 2007-2010 CR-V, and 2005-2010 Accords (models with cylinder engines). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:33 pm
Affected vehicles include the 2005-2008 Element, the 2007-2010 CR-V, and 2005-2010 Accords (models with cylinder engines). [read post]