Search for: "Freescale Semiconductor Incorporated" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 9:50 am by Alex Gasser
  The joint motion added, however, that the settlement agreement does not resolve claims raised against non-Freescale products incorporated in products of Customer Respondents. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. of Austin, Texas; Broadcom Corporation of Irvine, California; LSI Corporation of Milpitas, California; MediaTek Inc. of Hsin-Chu, Taiwan; nVidia Corporation of Santa Clara, California; STMicroelectronics N.V. of Geneva, Switzerland; STMicroelectronics Inc. of Carrollton, Texas; Asustek Computer, Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; Asus Computer International Inc. of Fremont, California; Audio Partnership PLC of London, United Kingdom;… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:11 am
Downstream products incorporate the offending semiconductor device. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:37 am by Lax & Neville LLP
  The Complaint further alleges that Servergy and its then-CEO, Mapp, “led investors to believe that the [Cleantech-1000] was in high demand by falsely claiming notable companies like Amazon.com and Freescale Semiconductors had pre-ordered the product. [read post]
28 May 2010, 12:08 pm by Tom Fisher
  The complaint named Spansion, Inc. and Spansion, LLC (collectively, “Spansion”), Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am by Jason Rantanen
  The patented technology had been originally assigned to Freescale, an integrated circuit manufacturer spun off from Motorola, later purchased by another semiconductor manufacturer, NXP. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]