Search for: "Frontline Communications, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2021, 8:29 am by Lisa Stam
Jennifer Hendry-Lynn (Naturopathic Doctor), and Stachen Frederick (ED, Weston Frontlines Centre). [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:00 pm by bteam
By Kuae Kelch Mattox National President, Mocha Moms, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 2. 8573123 Canada Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
ANOTHER STORY FROM THE FRONTLINE OF STUDENT DEBT INDEBTEDNESSStruggling lawyer who moved back in with parents struggles to discharge Access Group Inc. loans taken out to pay for law school; fails at summary stage in adversary proceeding, but will have another chance to present her law-degree-for-naught argument at trial. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 5:11 am
“Nobody predicted any of that,” said Vanu Bose, chief executive of Vanu Inc. in Cambridge and a partner in Frontline, which has proposed building an open network for public safety and commercial use. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Patent Baristas) (The Invent Blog) RXP keeps on growing as five more companies sign the dotted line (IAM) How patent vulnerability impacts valuation (IP Frontline) Ensuring quality patents through a rigorous review process (IP Frontline) Ocean Tomo, IP Exchange International launch OTI.com for global IP market data (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Research circles, communities of practice and IP consciousness (IP finance) Trade secrets: front and center? [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined by the… [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O)   Global Global - General Latest round of ACTA negotiations wrap up (Michael Geist) Year’s end thoughts on IP monetisation (IPEG) The paradox of accounting innovation (IP Frontline)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands Corporate logos –… [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by News Desk
” Green Plains Inc. operates 13 biorefineries across the United States and has donated a significant amount to the project from its York, NE, facility. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) OHIM Board of Appeal rules on functional designs: R 690/2007-3 (Class 99) X5 and CEO Are they still riding side by side – Munich District Court and Turin District Court draw deviating conclusions in design dispute (Class 99) USPTO’s transparency puts Europe to shame (IAM) EU community patent and UPLS: Will there be a political breakthrough soon? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) - 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India's visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) - 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India's visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners)   Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) – 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat)   India WIPO Director General pledges support for India’s visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]