Search for: "GPA Holding Inc"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
City of Yucaipa (Target Stores, Inc., Real Party In Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2015) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, 2015 WL 3564971. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
By William W. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:36 am
Nevertheless, this is the picture at the beginning of 2012, a year which may well hold both economic and political surprises. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
