Search for: "General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency and the state filed the settlement Thursday afternoon, just hours after the government sued the company in federal court. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
The State Water Resources Control Board Releases Proposed Rule Modifying The General Permit For Suction Dredge Miners. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Miriam Seifter
The parties on NAM’s side of the case include agricultural companies and trade associations, electric utilities, states and environmental groups – all frequent challengers of EPA decisions. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:26 am by Miriam Seifter
The petitioners — a varied group including the National Association of Manufacturers, states, environmental groups, electric utilities and agricultural companies — all argue that the Clean Water Rule does not fall within any of the EPA actions on the list, so lawsuits challenging the rule should be filed in district court. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when its employees defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1484Issue: (1) Whether, contrary to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Petitioner, a native and citizen of Indonesia, entered the United States in 1994 on a non-immigrant visa and overstayed his six-month authorization. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
” According to the White House, “The two sides [China and the United States] maintain that a vigorous response is necessary and that international cooperation is indispensable in responding to this challenge. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
” According to the White House, “The two sides [China and the United States] maintain that a vigorous response is necessary and that international cooperation is indispensable in responding to this challenge. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have the power—absent an express authorization from Congress—to set emissions caps for power plants in a way that would drastically alter the U.S. energy system. [read post]