Search for: "Gilmore v. State of Maryland" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2017, 7:09 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Surveillance video The appellants, Ernest Flowers and Larry Gilmore, were both convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City by a jury, presided over by Judge Paul E. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Extension of committed person’s term — Circuit court jurisdiction In this case we consider whether the Circuit Court for Baltimore County retained jurisdiction to extend a committed individual’s conditional release term when the Maryland Department of Health’s application to extend the term was filed two days after it was set to expire. ... [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:13 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Surveillance video The appellants, Ernest Flowers and Larry Gilmore, were both convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City by a jury, presided over by Judge Paul E. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:55 pm by Nate Cardozo
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Thursday, when EFF, human rights lawyer Scott Gilmore, and the law firms of Jones Day and Robins Kaplan went to court in Kidane v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:46 pm by Karen Gullo
EFF, Robins Kaplan LLP, and Guernica 37: International Justice Chambers represent a Maryland man whose home computer was infected by state-sponsored malware known as FinSpy. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Gilmore] Tags: Alabama, art and artists, constitutional law, folk law, Maryland, photography, sexual orientation, transgender [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]