Search for: "Givens v. Yan" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm by Alex Duperouzel
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009, para 197). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 7:21 pm by Adeline Chong
It was undisputed that the transaction, if performed, would have violated Chinese law (See Lyu Yan v Lim Tien Chiang [2020] SGHC 145, [15]-[16]). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, a  department policy does not trump the probationary period established by law or by a rule or regulations having the force and effect of law [Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 2014 NY Slip Op 07261, Appellate Division, First Department].In addition, a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14] may set out procedures to be followed by an appointing authority regarding the… [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The defendant was held to have a genuine and reasonable belief that the publications were in the public interest, given the inadequacies of the police response and the growth of the MeToo movement. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Government has published its action plan to better protect journalists from threats of violence and intimidation, which includes every UK police force being given access to a designated journalist safety liaison officer. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Not surprisingly, given the absence of any non-litigation experts endorsing the causal conclusion, the defendants challenged plaintiffs’ proffered expert witnesses under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
 From liberal democratic baseline constitutional perspective, it is “the other” of constitutional theory[3]--adjudged only as a function of the ideal[4]--which for the greater portion of the established constitutional jurisprudence elite is, by their definition, some variation of late 20th century classical liberal democratic constitutionalism.[5]At best, and grudgingly, given space within the constitutional discourse as “authoritarian” constitutionalism--the… [read post]