Search for: "Government of the United States of America"
Results 1 - 20
of 17,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) Supreme Court “Only the gravest effects of interference with family life would make extradition disproportionate to the public interest in the prevention of crime. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:28 am
Edwards v Government of the United States of America [2007] EWHC 1877 (Admin) “In deciding whether there was dual criminality under the Extradition Act 2003, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:13 am
Additional facts inadmissible in extradition Edwards v Government of United States of America “In deciding whether there was dual criminality in extradition, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 2:19 am
Government of the United States of America “The principle of stare decisis was not absolute and the Privy Council should exercise its power to depart from precedent if it concluded that one of its own previous decisions was incorrect, even if that incorrect decision could no longer be regarded as impeding the proper development of the law. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Government of the United States of America Privy Council “The principle of stare decisis was not absolute and the Privy Council could exercise its power to depart from precedent if it concluded that one of its own previous decisions was incorrect. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 2:40 am
” The moniker United States of America has remained since then as a symbol of freedom and independence. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 2:40 am
” The moniker United States of America has remained since then as a symbol of freedom and independence. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
The International Corporate Governance Network (“ICGN”) is pleased to publish its Governance Recommendations for the United States (U.S.) at the ICGN Conference, hosted by the International Finance Corporation, in Washington, D.C., from 7-8 March 2024. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
The International Corporate Governance Network (“ICGN”) is pleased to publish its Governance Recommendations for the United States (U.S.) at the ICGN Conference, hosted by the International Finance Corporation, in Washington, D.C., from 7-8 March 2024. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:22 pm
Council of State Governments – America’s Knowledge Economy: A State-by-State Review: “The United States’ long-term economic growth will be determined by its ability to encourage the research and development that fosters innovation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
Blount with the blog faculty Today, the White House released a new National Space Policy of the United States of America. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:00 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On 1 February 2022, data compiled by Bloomberg found that the total amount of traded distressed bonds and loans in the Americas totalled USD65.5bn, increasing by 6.5 per cent week-on-week. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Grenada International Extradition Treaty with the United States May 30, 1996, Date-Signed September 14, 1999, Date-In-Force EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF GRENADA The Government of the United States of America and the Government of Grenada, Recalling the Extradition Treaty between the United States of… [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
