Search for: "House v. Aetna Life Insurance Company"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 8:45 am
Aetna Life Insurance Company involves the scope of permissible discovery in an ERISA lawsuit brought when an insurer terminates a claimant’s short-term disability benefits and denies him long-term disability benefits. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In Home Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:30 am
Aetna Life Ins. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Reynolds Tobacco Company v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Application of the accommodation in the case of “self-insured” plans, however, may raise slightly more complicated questions.Insured plansMost employers purchase their employees’ insurance coverage from an insurance company, or issuer, such as Aetna or Blue Cross/Blue Shield. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Settlement between Aetna and NY: Aetna developed a doctor ranking system that they represented was based on quality, but really it was based on cost to the insurer. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Levy, 247 P. 967 (Oklahoma Supreme Court 1026); Aetna Life Ins. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
Paul Morgan controlled several banks, Western Union, the Pullman Car Company, Aetna Life Insurance, General Electric and 2-1 railroad companies. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
In our recent case of Edward Charles Washington and Travis Parker versus Aetna Life Insurance d/b/a One Canal Place, Schindler Elevator Corporation, Corporate Realty Advisors, and Zurich Insurance Company, Docket Number 01-9541-C of the Civil District Court of the City of New Orleans, all of the issues with respect to the potential modification of the video tape surveillance evidence was presented to us for defending. [read post]
