Search for: "IN RE RITCHIE" Results 1 - 20 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 12:00 am by John L. Welch
[Note that the article expresses her viewpoint and is not intended to reflect the views of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board].As we know, the CAFC in In re Bose raised the bar for proving fraud on the USPTO. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 2:12 pm
There are a number of tribute videos to Ritchie Valens, like this one. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 3:54 am
In re Espinosa Cigars, LLC Serial No. 85772938 (October 3, 2014) [not precedential].In its appeal brief, applicant asked the Board to take judicial notice of three references to the song "La Bamba," a traditional Mexican wedding song re-worked by Richie Valens into his "best remembered recording. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 4:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
by Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser – March 25, 2020 – “Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world’s largest problems. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm by Stephen Bilkis
She is denying rumors that she and her spouse Guy Ritchie are splitting up, but the rockstar has met with divorce lawyer Fiona Shackleton, who took on Heather Mills for Beatle Paul. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 3:16 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Young Living Essential Oils, LC, Serial No. 87684401 (August 9, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm by Joe Patrice
It’s not a Texas admissions meeting, so you’re still not going to learn the relative merits of a 128 LSAT. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:45 am
In re Aquitaine Wine USA, LLC, Serial No. 86928469 (April 2, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson; concurring opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie).The Marks: The Board found, not surprisingly, that both the applied-for mark and the cited mark are dominated by the word LAROQUE. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 3:12 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Ben Zour, Serial No. 87210472 (December 19, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Francie R. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:15 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Thomas Barnette, Serial No. 87425197 (January 29, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:23 am
[Answer in first comment].In re David Copeland-Smith, Serial No. 85498107 ((March 9, 2018) (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas) [not precedential]. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
Greenbaum) [Section 2(d) refusal of LEAF BY OSCAR in view of the registered mark OSCAR, both for cigars].In re Q’Sai Co., Ltd., Serial No. 79157321 (November 15, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark Q’SAI for fruit juice, concentrates for making fruit juice, vegetable juices, and food products, in view of the registered mark SAI for "soft drinks, namely, noncarbonated soft drinks; beauty beverages, namely,… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
" Applicant's specimen of useIn re Aquitaine Wine USA, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1181 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson; concurring opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]