Search for: "INTER CONSTRUCTION LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2019, 9:27 pm by Patent Docs
Federal Circuit Upholds Invalidity of Video Game Patent Despite Board's Incorrect Claim Construction By Joseph Herndon -- CG Technology Development, LLC (CG Tech) appealed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Final Written Decision holding that the claims of U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:20 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark's Patent Trial and Appeal Board was entitled to perform claim construction in inter partes review proceedings using the broadest reasonable interpretation standard. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Reg. 21221) today which would provide a change to the claim construction standard used in Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs), Post-Grant Proceedings (PGRs), and Covered Business Method Reviews (CBMs). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cuozzo (P.T.A.B. 2013)  Download Notice-15 In what appears to be the first Inter Partes Revew petition decided on the merits, the USPTO Patent Trials and Appeal Board (PTAB) has granted Garmin's petition for inter partes review of only claims 10, 14, and 17 of US Patent 6,778,074 owned by Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Cheryl Beise
The Board’s construction was supported by the claims, the specification, and the prosecution history. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:41 am by Zijian Han
Cytonome/ST, LLC, the case addresses a claim construction issue regarding whether a claim term is plural-allowing. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:24 am
Garmin did not identify its proposed construction. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm by Patent Docs
First, the Court held unanimously that the USPTO properly applied the "broadest reasonable interpretation" standard for claim construction for IPRs. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:41 am by Steven Koprince
The G&C Fab-Con size appeal involved three VA RFPs for construction projects at national cemeteries. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
(Petitioner) requested inter partes review (IPR) of claims 1–18 of U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:28 pm by Daniel Yannuzzi
In this case, In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, the patentee challenged the PTO’s basis for instituting an IPR proceeding on several patent claims. [read post]