Search for: "In Re: v. In Re:"
Results 1 - 20
of 62,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
In Maryland v Shatzer, the US Supreme Court set a bright-line rule regarding the time period that must elapse before the police may re-question a suspect who has previously invoked Miranda. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:13 am
v=J5gCeWEGiQI De : teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu [mailto:teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu] De la part de Jewell, Michael Envoyé : 12 octobre 2011 12:34 À : Teknoids Objet : [teknoids] RE: Feels like a Friday to me Better… http://www.youtube.com/user/wdwstuff#p/a/f/0/we-AqDtlsEc From: teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu [mailto:teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Sparks, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:39 AM… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:09 pm
Because a dismissal with prejudice is a determination on the merits for res judicata purposes, the Federal Bankruptcy Court's dismissal of the prior bankruptcy proceeding with prejudice precludes this action.Fuschi v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:26 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 9:44 pm
McDonald containing a comment about the re-examination of the Berkeley/Eolas patent:For example, the $521 million jury verdict in the Eolas Technologies v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 5:30 am
Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:00 pm
Judicial estoppel is invoked in the Kilopass re-examinationThe requester cited to Minnesota Mining v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:20 pm
Notice is inferred where res ipsa loquitur applies.Valdez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:19 am
Therefore, the doctrine of res judicata does not bar the claims in the instant action.Student note: Plain and simple, where a dismissal does not involve a determination on the merits, the doctrine of res judicata does not apply.Case: Canzona v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:08 pm
Sub LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Here: Oklahoma Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills Tribal Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills The Tenth Circuit previously abated this matter pending the outcome in Michigan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:43 am
Why the Colorado Supreme Court Got it Wrong in Rojas V. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
On Tuesday, the First Circuit issued a landmark decision on cy pres, In re Lupron Marketing. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:16 pm
Read more » The post Mitigation and Offers of Re-employment: Fredrickson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:46 am
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 ”In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:09 am
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 “In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 11:45 am
Levis sues Quiksilver re fabric tabs on back pockets of jeans. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:01 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to the applicability of the doctrine, and so plaintiff cannot rely on res ipsa loquitur at trial.Student note: The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence that permits an inference of negligence to be drawn solely from the happening of an accident where the plaintiff can show that: (1) the event is of the kind that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of someone's negligence; (2) the… [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:25 am
The White Cliffs of Dover Author Walter Mittelholzer 1894-1937 Jane Lambert Trade Marks Registry (Ms A Skilton) Re VERA LYNN, Lynn v Halewood International Brands Ltd, BL O/766/19 12 Dec 2019 Dame Vera Lynn was born in 1917 and is still going strong. [read post]