Search for: "In Re: Mark A. Stewart" Results 1 - 20 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2014, 9:16 am
Richard Re has another entertaining post at his new Supreme Court-focused blog, this time about the use of exclamation marks in judicial opinions. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 2:23 pm by KJK
” Listen to the full podcast here, with Janet’s interview beginning around the 21:00 mark. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:13 am
But if you’re checking your Google-fame status, be sure to search google.co.uk with and without quotation marks around your name and let us know what you find. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:10 pm
Jon Stewart sets his sights on the hiring scandal and ATL's favorite DOJ diva in this "news report:" Click to the 2:50 mark for a classic Goodling moment. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:24 pm by Walter Olson
HHS doesn’t think you’re sophisticated enough to handle that freedom [Stewart Baker] Uh-oh: some New York lawmakers want “a more refined First Amendment” [Slashdot, Lucy Steigerwald] Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Paula Black
Mark and I have been on many programs together over the years. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:54 am by Dennis Crouch
STEWART: It places no restrictions on his ability to use the mark. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Lara
 It usually takes about a year from application through registration (unless you’re Herman Cain). [read post]
Additionally, Mark Lyttle, a U.S. citizen formerly detained at Stewart, has a lawsuit pending against the U.S. government for his wrongful detention and deportation. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 1:10 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., February 12, 2016) (affirming denial of disability and supplemental benefits based on review of issues not raised below, learning disability, simple work limitations, GAF scores, and credibility)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:14 pm
  This thorny question is at the heart of several recent prosecutions of lawyers for conduct within their role as lawyers, sending a chill down the spine  of many a committed advocate: prosecutions such as those of Mayer  Brown partner Joseph Collins, Gen Re general counsel Robert Graham, Sidley Austin partner Raymond Ruble, Hollinger International general  counsel Mark Kipnis, Lynne Stewart, Computer… [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
I’M HEADING OFF TO A SECURE, UNDISCLOSED LOCATION, and I’ll have a bunch of guestbloggers filling in here: Not only my usual crew of Ann Althouse, Megan McArdle, and Michael Totten, but to lighten the load on them, quite a few others: Ed Driscoll, sometime InstaPundit correspondent Stewart Baker (whose new book on counterterrorism, Skating On Stilts, will be coming out soon), Radley Balko, and Mark Tapscott. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:48 pm by Bill Marler
Today, the Court in Georgia Federal Court in the criminal case against Stewart Parnell, et al., allowed the defense to question whether PCA and Stewart Parnell was responsible for the death of nine. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Gordon“Stewart Motha re-envisions the Indian Ocean as a material site of law, violence, and dispossession that he compellingly terms an ‘archive of the present. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by IMattson
While you might think you're stuck with Justice Potter Stewart's classic definition of obscenity ("I know it when I see it") when the examining attorneys make their decisions, a series of USPTO determinations has recently been collected that give you a more solid understanding of just what kinds of marks have been considered immoral, deceptive, or scandalous.Trademarks Laid Bare: Marks that May be Scandalous or Immoral (available in the… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:54 pm by Mark Bennett
Well, Stewart: I think it's probably because you're a freak who thinks he's going to impress the ladies with your excellence at submission. [read post]