Search for: "In Re: Reebok Easytone"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 7:06 am
See In re Reebok Easytone Litig., No. 4:10-cv-11977-FDS (D. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:28 am
Reebok must also cease making claims about the health benefits of its shoes unless they’re backed up by at least one well-controlled human clinical study. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 pm
Reebok agreed to pull certain advertisements for its EasyTone and RunTone toning shoes and issue $25 million in refunds to customers who bought the shoes. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:48 am
The claims made by Reebok aren’t just material, they’re probably the only reason anyone would buy the sneakers. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:11 pm
(“Reebok” or “the Company”) for charges that the Company disseminated false and misleading advertisements for its EasyTone and RunTone shoes. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:31 am
A recent NAD case involved some of the same products and claims in the FTC action -- NAD examined Reebok’s testing to support claims for the EasyTone footwear and found Reebok had conducted an independent study by a qualified expert, but concluded the study was too small and the testing in a lab did not necessarily reflect real world conditions of women using the shoes in daily life. [read post]
