Search for: "In re: Specialty Products Holding Corp., et al." Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., Civil Action No. 07–11944–DPW, 2013 WL 4812425 (D. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm by Sasha Volokh
See Hayashi et al., A Guide to the ATM and Debit Card Industry 7 (2003) (noting the importance of “national networks,” such as the Visa and MasterCard networks, in linking smaller ATM networks to ensure accessibility). [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11, 26 (1st Cir. 2011), which was decided four months after her passing.[8] Professor Berger’s contention about the need to avoid assessments of individual studies in favor of the whole “tsumish” must also be rejected because Federal Rule of Evidence 703 requires that each study considered by an expert witness “qualify” for reasonable reliance by virtue of the study’s containing facts or data that… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2011), cert. denied sub nom., U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]