Search for: "In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 2:07 pm
In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation will now proceed to trial. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of employees in a wage suppression “no employee solicitation” antitrust case in In Re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, Case No.: 11-CV-02509, 2013 U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm
See In Re High Tech Emp. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:17 am
(In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, May 16, 2014, Koh, L). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of California nevertheless held in In Re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, No.: 11-CV-02509, 2013 U.S. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:09 pm
The court noted that the federal enclave defense would be more appropriately addressed when class certification was considered, because the doctrine might extinguish the Cartwright Act claims of a putative subclass of plaintiffs.The decision is In Re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,866. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:04 am
” In re High–Tech Employee Litig., 856 F. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 2:20 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California rejected the parties’ $324.5 million proposed class action settlement as inadequate and denied the Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval in In Re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, 11-CV-0250, 2014 U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:49 am
The decision is In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, 2014 U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
The case, In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, is pending in the Northern District of California; the case number is 1-CV-2509-LHK. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
" In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, No. 5:11-cv-02509, order at 6 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
It is not surprising that the Biden administration is being staffed by antitrust critics of big tech such as Tim Wu and Lina Khan. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
It is not surprising that the Biden administration is being staffed by antitrust critics of big tech such as Tim Wu and Lina Khan. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
For example, this is what occurred in the highly publicized consolidated class action entitled In Re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:18 am
[Case No. 5:11-CV-02509, In Re: High Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, N.D. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:25 pm
The antitrust message can discuss self-interest, and how employees that master the antitrust rules are most likely to accomplish their business goals and advance their careers. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
” (n.7) Perhaps “poaching” was already used to describe competition for employees in the high-tech world, but if not, it came to have that meaning. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm
Employer Concerns In spite of the publicity given to the issuance of the HR Guidance in 2016 and high-profile class action cases such as In Re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, No. 11-CV-02509 (“High-Tech”) (selected case documents available here), human resources personnel and other executives often do not realize that the antitrust laws apply to the employment marketplace. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:57 am
However, the court reduced class counsel’s attorney fees request by more than half, from over $81 million to $40 million (In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, September 2, 2015, Koh, L.). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:55 pm
Summary judgment was ultimately entered in favor of the defending oil companies in the long-running matter (In re: Compensation of Managerial, Professional and Technical Employees Antitrust Litigation, D. [read post]
