Search for: "In re: J and Y Investment LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2011, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in GSO RE Onshore LLC v Sapir ;2010 NY Slip Op 52138(U) ;Decided on November 24, 2010 ;Supreme Court, New York County ; Fried, J. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
Specifically, the court instructed the bank and the decedent’s parents that “[y]ou are either objecting to this petition for year’s support or you’re not. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:53 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Trump University, LLC, 2015 WL 7302728, No. 10cv0940 (S.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED, Petitioners,v.CASH BIZ, LP, CASH ZONE, LLC D/B/A CASH BIZ, AND REDWOOD FINANCIALS, LLC, Respondents.No. 16-0854.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued September 15, 2017.Opinion delivered: February 23, 2018. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
., Editor and Publisher of a local news website “[Y]our service has been invaluable to me for the past 30 years. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Wolfgang Demino
On September 15, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court will sit in Houston, TX (University of Houston Law Center) to hear oral argument on whether a payday lender may divert a class action filed against it over its practice of pursuing the collection of defaulted civil debts through criminal prosecution with bad-debt affidavits in violation of Texas law. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While one might argue that the class action mechanism renders such knowledge defenses irrelevant as a matter of collateral estoppel, a class benefitting from the Basic presumption is never accurately defined merely as purchasers between dates “X and Y,” but rather should be defined as purchasers between dates “X + Y, who did not know or believe that the misrepresentation was false or that an omission occurred. [read post]