Search for: "In re: National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., et al." Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
These questions remained highly contested through the end of the twentieth century. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(IP Think Tank) New force in Europe – EPLAW Patent Blog (IP Think Tank) IP references left out of last-minute, weak global climate deal in Copenhagen (IP Watch) UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen – IP discussion (IPKat) (Spicy IP) (IP Watch) (IP Watch) (WIPO) Implementing the Development Agenda nationally: WIPO seminar (Jeremy de Beer) WIPO traditional knowledge meeting stalls, but begins to breach trust gap (IP Watch) Poverty in the developing world: Should TRIPs really… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Think Tank) (The IP ADR Blog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) 50 years of scientific discovery and sharing in Antarctica may end thanks to patent greed (Techdirt) Take steps to limit the impact of licensee’s economic woes (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia TMO delegate allows ‘ElvisFinance’ covering financial services to proceed to registration despite opposition: Elvis Presley Enterprises Inc v Elvis Jelcic… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Afro-IP), UN agency to address link between IP assets and financial securities: (Intellectual Property Watch), ‘Free’ culture: it’s not what ‘we in the west’ might imagine: (IPcentral.info), What’s your intellectual property strategy? [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
You may read other coverage of this elsewhere, as in attendance were Aric Press of The American Lawyer, Leigh Jones of The National Law Journal, David Lat of AboveTheLaw, and other reporters. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
On June 30, 2021, the governing bodies of the NCAA passed a policy that suspended all NCAA NIL rules for incoming and current students.[23] In short, this suspension meant that NCAA athletes, for the first time, would have the opportunity to financially benefit from their NIL effective July 1, 2021.[24] The NCAA offered the following guidance to its athletes and its member institutions: Individuals can engage in NIL activities that are consistent with the law of the state where the school… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
This qualified authority, unlike the power often exercised in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by the English Crown, is limited to the promotion of advances in the “useful arts. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
He made this type of argument before to oppose changes in copyright that would provide rights holders tools to go after enterprises engaged in the business of piracy. [read post]