Search for: "In re: SEALED APPELLANT" Results 1 - 20 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
In In re Baker, the appellate court had to decide whether one judge had erred by unsealing thirteen search warrants that were issued and placed under seal by various other judges without first giving notice to the state or evaluating the disclosure factors described above. 220 N.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Counsel do not satisfy this burden by simply stating that the originating court sealed the matter, as the circumstances that justified sealing in the originating court may have changed or may not apply in an appellate proceeding. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Andrew Appel
What I found was that (1) the seals aren't always there; (2) even if they were, you can remove the cartridge without visible evidence of tampering with the seal and (3) you can remove the circuit-board cover without even disturbing the plastic-strap seal; (4) even if that hadn't been true, the seal-inspection records are quite lackadaisical and incomplete; and (5) even if that weren't true, since the counties tend to re-use the same serial… [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  Right out of the gate, the appellate judges noticed one glaring problem, the judge did not say “why” he denied the sealing. [read post]
6 May 2015, 12:09 pm
As the trial court acknowledged, the passage of time works in his favor, and if appellant furthers his rehabilitation, he will in the future have the opportunity to ask the trial court to seal his records. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:23 pm by Jane Chong
Randy Smith and Murguia of the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument in In re National Security Letter, Under Seal v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809F.3d at 1096; see also In re Violation of Rule 28(D), 635 F.3d1352, 1356 (Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 11:35 am by Alex Moss
That’s why EFF challenged the Federal Circuit’s decision on Friday, petitioning for re-hearing by the panel or the entire court. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:50 am by Eric Beasley
It further noted that if the trial court determined that the record needed to remain sealed, it needed to articulate the compelling reason that required the continued sealing of the records and provide sufficient factual detail so that the decision could be properly evaluated by the appellate court. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:01 am by Ron Coleman
 They’re no different from us in that way. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
 On similar grounds, he then moves to have his juvenile records sealed. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:58 am by Rob Howse
  In this respect we should all re-read carefully the likeness discussion in EC-Asbestos. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
" Here, neither party ever made a formal, written motion for leave to file its appellate briefs, substantive motions, or other submissions under seal. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:51 am by Eugene Volokh
In any event, I just wanted to flag this in case some other courts will find it helpful—we're always happy to help with such appointments. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
More broadly, we would be able to help: with briefs opposing sealing, with briefs opposing pseudonymity, and with briefs (usually in appellate courts) defending the decision below on any First Amendment or First-Amendment-related question, when the appellee isn't appearing (we're doing that now in a Ninth Circuit trademark law case) or when the appellant and appellee both disagree with the decision below, in state or federal courts, trial or… [read post]