Search for: "In re: Smith & Nephew Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2009, 11:22 pm
A press release on July 24 from patent challenger Smith & Nephew indicates that Kinetic Concepts [KCI] has won a round in the US re-examination fight but suggests outcomes have been different in other jurisdictions (countries):Smith & Nephew Inc.'s Advanced Wound Management division announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Patent Office) has issued actions in re-examination proceedings involving… [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:15 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., that administrative patent judges ("APJs") were improperly appointed in violation of the Appointments Clause, to ex parte proceedings in In re Boloro Global Limited. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
According to the FCPA Professor, in a post entitled “Next Up – Smith & Nephew”, Smith and Nephew and its German subsidiary, would sell products to the entities “at a discount to the ‘list’ price and the Greek Distributor would re-sell to Greek HCPs and government hospitals at a profit. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 1:15 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., which was an appeal from an inter partes review, holding that administrative patent judges (APJs) were not constitutionally appointed. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
However, if you’re a glutton for punishment or have a (somewhat unhealthy) predilection for rounding conventions (as, strangely, this Kat does), then off we go.ConvaTec Technologies and Smith & Nephew have added another court appearance to their long list of confrontations. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., entered on Halloween 2019, a panel of the Federal Circuit held that the administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) were improperly appointed, and remanded the case for a new decision by a properly appointed panel. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
MDL No. 2197 – In Re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
MDL No. 2197 – In Re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:27 pm
Smith &Nephew, Inc. 688 F.3d 1342, 1360 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:03 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., Arthrex asks the justices to step in once again. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:34 pm
(In re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:05 pm
The consolidated federal case is In re DePuy Orthopedics Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 10-MD-2197, U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:29 am
The consolidated federal case is In re DePuy Orthopedics Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 10-MD-2197, U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 3:05 pm
The consolidated federal case is In re DePuy Orthopedics Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 10-MD-2197, U.S. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:29 am
Defense attorneys for several of the defendants – specifically, Zimmer Holdings, Zimmer, Inc., Stryker Corp., Biomet, DePuy Orthopaedics and/or DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Smith & Nephew plc and Smith & Nephew, Inc., id., at *1 n.2 – filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:15 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 688 F.3d 1342, 1367 (Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320, 1325(Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 100 F. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
Smith & Nephew Impact on Ex Parte Examination: In the pending case of In re: Boloro Global Limited, Appeal No. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2-09-cv-00378 (TXED April 12, 2010, Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Ward, J.) [read post]
