Search for: "In re Diamond Decisions Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
In re The Hyman Companies, Inc., Serial No. 85483397 (January 14, 2015) [not precedential].A mark is deceptive if: (1) it contains matter that is misdescriptive of the character, quality, function, composition or use of the goods; (2) prospective purchasers would be likely to believe that the misdescription actually describes the goods; and (3) the misdescription would be likely to affect a significant portion of the relevant consumers’ decision to purchase the… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Diamond Foods, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:43 pm
In Diamond Z Trailer, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:43 pm
In Diamond Z Trailer, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 7:13 pm
A LANDMARK DECISION IN US PATENT LAW : IN RE BILSKI (2008 WL 4757110 (Fed. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
Diamond Resorts International, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Angel Automotive, Inc., 839 F.3d 639, 649 (7th Cir. 2016). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Solomon Kaplan, defendant-appellant
NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeDeath of A Party Did Not Stop Decision Being Rendered If Death Occurred After Motion Argued, Submitted PDV (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:09 am
Z Kor Diamonds Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:07 am
Within Ex parte Diamond , KSR is cited to sustain a REVERSAL of an obviousness rejection:We agree with Appellants that the Examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie case of obviousness. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 6:16 am
We've now had a chance to read the Eighth Circuit's short (ten-page) decision in In re St. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm
Flook, 437 U.S. 584 (1978) and Diamond v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:24 am
Sequenom, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 12:22 pm
VBS Distribution, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:07 pm
Judge Linn dissented from that decision, applying the § 101 framework from Diamond v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Appellants rely principally on the Seventh Circuit's decision in In re Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 288 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir.2002) ("Bridgestone"), a case involving the certification of a nationwide class alleging tort claims arising under the laws of all fifty states. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 7:41 pm
" In Bilski, the Federal Circuit seized on a sentence from Diamond v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 10:48 pm
S. 175 (1981); Diamond v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The decision in the Lazare Kaplan v. [read post]
