Search for: "In the Matter of: Sea Bridge Marine, Inc." Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Under the Limitation of Vessel Owner's Liability Act, court granted a tug owner partial summary judgment against bridge owner after the tug collided with bridge where the bridge owner could not establish the tug's unseaworthiness or negligence of tug'
1 Nov 2007, 11:22 am
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF SEA WOLF MARINE TOWING AND TRANSPORTATION, INC., AS OWNER OF THE TUG SEA WOLF FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2007 U.S. [read post]
Cruise Ship Law Blog - http://blog.lipcon.com/
New York Law Journal Decisions of Interest November 20, 2007
20 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiralty Court Rejects Amtrak's Challenge to Limit Tug Owner's Liability Over Bridge Collision Matter of Sea Wolf Marine Towing and Transportation Inc. [read post]
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library - http://crimlawlib.blogspot.com/
Breaking News - Bauman Trumps Jurisdiction By Consent in Second Circuit – and New Post-Bauman Cheat Sheet on General Personal Jurisdiction
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Isonas, Inc., 2014 WL 10988340 (C.D. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Untitled
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
AmClyde, 511 U.S. 202 (1994), and Boca Grande Club, Inc. v. [read post]
Goldsmith & Ogrodowski's Admiralty Update Blog - http://admiraltyupdate.blogspot.com/
It’s the National Security, Stupid
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Minna Ålander
The construction blueprints of all strategically located bridges include a mechanism to attach explosives onto the bridge to disrupt the forward movement of an enemy in case of an attack. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Second, the department’s analysis of the spineflower mitigation measures was legally impermissible because there was no substantial evidence that the mitigation matters were adequate. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2014 CEQA 1st QUARTER REVIEW
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
County of Marin (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 1098). [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/