Search for: "Insurance Companies X,Y" Results 1 - 20 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2013, 9:12 am by Buce
A while back I puzzled over the "the Holland principle"--the idea that the US “insurance company with an army,” or is it the other way round. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 2:55 pm by PhoneBlogger
If the insurance company sends you a letter stating its refusal to cover X, Y, and Z, but that it is going to defend you under its reservation of rights, you may have the right to hire your own lawyer or, at least, seriously consider it. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 7:49 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
  If Insurance Company Y has a slightly higher price, but provides excellent service and lower than average claim cost, the insurance broker would be violating his/her fiduciary responsibility to the employer if he/she recommends Insurance Company X without fully explaining and discussing his/her knowledge of both Company X and Y. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
Company Y agrees to buy X for $80 million and promises that X’s shareholders will be made whole. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
 But that's not the case here:  the insurance companies didn't materially rely on rule X (since the losses had already transpired), and my sense is that the current justices on the California Supreme Court -- like many commentators -- aren't thrilled with rule X either. [read post]
30 May 2010, 5:24 am
If health insurance companies are required to pay out "X" but their premiums are limited to "Y" then they will have to find creative ways to stay in compliance.Here are some things that will happen, some of them starting before January of 2011.Carriers will look to cut administrative costs any way they can. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:58 am by Ioannis Kampianakis
Further, the Court overruled the decision in Company X v Company Y, by which the Commercial Court felt bound, noting that it doubted most people incorporating the clause were aware of that decision. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm by Employment Lawyers
An Affirmative Action plan is one that requires employers to hire X number of unemployed applicants for every Y number of employed applicants that it hires. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:00 am
  For example, if a policyholder believes she has been cheated out of homeowners insurance money by Company X, does that person really think that companies Y and Z are much better? [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
  That means that X (or someone claiming through X), who was allegedly injured by Y, cannot sue Z, who is Y’s liability insurer.Well, now it appears that there may be an exception – if the injured person also happens to be a Medicare beneficiary. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:13 am by CodeX
This approach has been deployed at scale by some insurance companies to automate the FNOL process and perform coverage checks. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:38 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
(D) Proceeds of insurance, including accidental death benefits, on the life of the decedent, if the decedent owned the insurance policy immediately before death or if and to the extent the decedent alone and immediately before death held a presently exercisable general power of appointment over the policy or its proceeds. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:25 pm
To put that in plain language: If you are on workers’ comp, and you and your spouse are only bringing in a certain amount of money a month, and you’ve “conservatively” budgeted to spend Y amount of money (where Y is less than X), then you may not be as safe as the math says you will be. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:55 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
  The Judge considered himself bound by the decision of Mr Justice Morison in Company X v Company Y, an unreported decision of July 2000, having found that it was not obviously wrong. [read post]