Search for: "Interface, Inc. et al v. J&J Industries, Inc."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2009, 2:34 pm
Feb. 25, 2009) (Murphy, J.)* Interface, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:42 am
Micro-Probe Inc. et al. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:42 am
Micro-Probe Inc. et al. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Spicy IP) Section 3(d) Patents Actand utility model (Spicy IP) The polymorphism of trade mark dilution in India (Spicy IP) Montenegro IP Office of Montenegro functional since 28 May 2008 - term for validation is 28 November 2008 (RelatIP) Nigeria Nigeria textile industry under threat from China fakes (Afro-IP) Norway Use on foreign-language website fails to save Munch mark (Class 46) Poland Polish minister of sport's plans to sell… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Fibre Works, Inc., 575 F.2d 1152, 1157 (6th Cir. 1978) (Markey, J.). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
