Search for: "J. DOE # 4" Results 1 - 20 of 8,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2012, 5:37 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-4 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01677-WTL-DMLFile Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2012Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:03 am
The determination under Section 2(e)(4) depends on how the public perceives the term. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:43 pm
I had previously worked in the US for 4 months on a J-1 visa. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 4:13-cv-00026-TLS-JEMFile Date: Monday, April 22, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In contrast thereto, decision J 4/11 could not apply, as that decision dealt with a case where the application was “deemed to be withdrawn” rather than withdrawn by the appellant.[1] The Board agrees with the appellant that the starting point of the legal analysis should be decision G 1/09. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:22 am by Matthew Reisig
Unlike many other third degree crimes, the presumption of non-incarceration does not apply to N.J.S.A. 2C:13-4. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Case Law, 6th edition, 2010, VI.E.7.3.1), the due care required on behalf of the representative depending on the relationship between him and his client (J 19/04 [9]; J 1/07 [4.1]).[4] As correctly stated in the impugned decision, the representative has clearly and in due time informed the applicant of the fee being due. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:56 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Aspects that should be considered are, in particular, how long the proceedings before the national courts or authorities have been pending, the duration of the suspension and whether the request for suspension of the grant proceedings was filed at a late stage (J 6/10, point 4.2 of the reasons; J 7/10, point 4.1 of the reasons; J 15/13, point 2.5 of the reasons; J 33/03, point 2.2 of the reasons).These criteria have not to be fulfilled cumulatively, and they may… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
J 11/87 [3.3, 3.6]; J 27/94 [8)) and is not allowed to reverse these acts so that they can be considered as never filed (J 10/87 [12]; J 4/97 [2]).On the other hand, the Boards of Appeal considered that R 88 acknowledges as a further legal value the desirability of having regard to true as opposed to ostensible party intentions in legal proceedings (T 824/00 [6]) in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 9:15 am
January 2, 2008)(Ray, J.) the Bankruptcy Court was given the opportunity to interpret new section 222.25(4), Florida Statutes which allows a debtor to exempt personal property not to exceed $4,000 if he does not "claim or receive the benefits of a homestead exemption under s. 4, Art. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:13 am by Roel van Woudenberg
"In J 4/18, the application was filed by two natural persons, one of them having his residence in the Netherlands and the other in France. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al.CALKINS, J.[ ¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flannery's motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]