Search for: "JOHN DOE(S) 1 TO 10"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 11:56 am
Does 1-10, John Doe #4 has made a motion to dismiss the Linares declaration, dismiss the complaint, and quash the subpoena. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:50 pm
Does 1-5, the case pending in the Western District of Michigan targeting students at Northern Michigan University, pro se litigant John Doe #5 has moved for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order denying his motion to vacate and to quash.Defendant John Doe #5's Motion for Reconsideration*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary &… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
The judge then explains that [u]nder Local Civil Rule 7–10, Uber certifies that it attempted to identify John Doe I without success. . . . [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:02 pm
Does 1-17.Notice of Dismissal[Ed. note. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:33 am
Does 1-11, the case which targets Oklahoma State University students, "John Does" have made a motion to strike the RIAA's papers, and dismiss the complaint, based upon the RIAA's "contemptuous behavior" in disregard of the Court's rules and a Court order. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:16 am
Does 1-22, Dkt No. 07-00057. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
Does 1-22, 1:08-cv-00066-S-DLM (D. [read post]
New Rule Pertaining to John Doe Designations in Pleadings Recently Went Into Effect - Pa.R.C.P. 2005
6 May 2019, 9:43 am
On April 1, 2019, Pa.R.C.P. 2005, which governs the use of “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” designations in pleadings, took effect. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:39 am
1. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
It’s a hard thing to do and it’s rarely done. 10. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:03 am
This will be the very first time that there has been appellate scrutiny of the RIAA's ex parte "John Doe" procedure during the 5 years it's been in place. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
Update [2008-8-20 10:4:28 by Big Tent Democrat]: Battleground Poll has McCain by 1, 47-46. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has granted an interim stay of the subpoena calling for the identity of student "John Doe #3". [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm
It's about time a judge has woken up to the lack of personal jurisdiction in the John Doe cases. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:37 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:42 am
Does 1-13, a subpoena addressed to Verizon, calling for the identities and addresses of John Doe defendants, was returnable May 12th.On May 10th the Court stayed enforcement of the subpoena, and directed plaintiff's counsel to immediately notify Verizon of the stay.Unfortunately, as it turns out, Verizon had responded to the subpoena FIVE (5) DAYS BEFORE THE SUBPOENA'S RETURN DATE, on May 7th.Plaintiff's "motion for… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:18 pm
Does 1-16, the John Doe case targeting students at the State University of New York at Albany, a third student has joined the two already fighting the RIAA's subpoena, and the students' attorney filed an amended memorandum of law which, among other things, incorporates the recent decision, handed down September 24, 2008, in Capitol v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
For what it's worth, although John gets the big picture of the MCA right, there are several inaccurate statements in John's Op/Ed, including these: 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
To be clear, this conclusion ends the John Doe investigation because the special prosecutor’s legal theory is unsupported in either reason or law. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am
John Does 1-10, supra. [read post]
