Search for: "JOHN DOE (1) (a fictitious name)" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
  Table of Contents   Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published:… [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 5:40 am by Russell Knight
Fictitious Names In An Illinois Divorce Illinois law allows any litigant to request to use a pseudonym like John Doe or Jane Doe. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On April 1, 2019, Pa.R.C.P. 2005, which governs the use of “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” designations in pleadings, took effect. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Abhik Majumdar
It is when fictitious names like John Doe or Jane Roe are used to mask the identity of parties who cannot be named for concerns of privacy or other legal factors: examples include victims of rape or other sexual offences, parties who are underage and so on. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:15 am by Juan C. Antúnez
After months of waiting and still no PR, plaintiff’s counsel simply amended his complaint to name a fictitiousJohn Doe” as PR for the estate. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by South Florida Lawyers
To begin with, Defendant cannot maintain the Counter-Complaint under the fictitious nameJohn Doe” and be permitted to use his anonymity as both a sword and a shield. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:50 am by Michael H. Cohen
”                 Fictitious Name      Once a physician forms a professional medical corporation, the practice might apply for a fictitious name. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
” Defendant argues that a fictitious name or a John Doe name is insufficient to identify anyone, and therefore is insufficient to identify anyone with particularity. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
Doe, supra.This post only examines Doe’s challenge to the government’s having proved an essential element of the offense; it does not examine his argument regarding his sentence.The Court of Appeals appended this footnote to the first mention of “John Doe” in its opinion: “To the date of this writing the Defendant, who has refused to provide his name, has not been affirmatively identified and is referred to as… [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:16 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 In early December 2012, a detective monitoring shipments in a UPS facility discovered a suspicious looking package from "The Party Animal" addressed to a fictitious person named "Raymond Maven" that was on its way to be delivered to an address on West Dossey Road in Lakeland. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:47 am by Michael Froomkin
The leading case on this subject is Dendrite Int’l, Inc. v John Doe, No. 3, et al., 342 N.J. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
  The court begins the opinion by explaining thatAppellant John Doe appeals from his convictions of aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Section 367.3(b)(1) allows people qualified under section 6205 to proceed using a pseudonym such as John Doe and redact identifying characteristics. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Plaintiff James Dean, Inc. filed a trademark complaint against Twitter, as well as the fictitious persons, John Doe Defendants 1-5 Company, in an Indiana state court. [read post]