Search for: "JOHN DOES 1-4"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
Does 1-4, the Court refused to accept joinder of the four John Does, and dismissed as to John Does 2-4:August 1, 2006, decision*In its decision, the Court also noted the requirement of producing concrete evidence of a prima facie case, and ordered the plaintiffs to produce copies of the copyright registrations allegedly infringed by John Doe number 1.After receiving plaintiffs' new… [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:37 pm
John Does 1-4 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01677-WTL-DMLFile Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2012Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:23 pm
Does 1-5, a bittorrent download case pending in Manhattan before Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, John Doe #4 has filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and for severance and dismissal.Notice of MotionMemorandum of LawAffidavit of Morlan Ty RogersDeclaration of John Doe #4 Commentary & discussion:Slashdot var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
Does 1-5, a BitTorrent download case pending in Manhattan before Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, John Doe #4 filed his reply memo today, further supporting his motion to quash the subpoena, and to sever and dismiss the claim against him. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
A motion to quash is being made by John Doe #4, in Malibu Media v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:58 am
John Does 1-11 Court Case Number: 4:12-cv-00043-JD-APR File Date: Monday, July 30, 2012 Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:56 am
Does 1-10, John Doe #4 has made a motion to dismiss the Linares declaration, dismiss the complaint, and quash the subpoena. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:49 am
John Does 1-26 Court Case Number: 4:12-cv-00048-JVB-PRC File Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Plaintiff: Third Degree Films Inc Plaintiff Counsel: Paul Joseph Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates, PLLC Defendant: John Does 1-26 Cause: Direct Copyright Infringement, Contributory Copyright Infringement Court: Northern District of Indiana Judge: Judge Joseph S. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:20 pm
4 new BitTorrent download cases, with 80 John Doe defendants, have been filed in Indiana involving the film Dallas Buyers Club. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 5:48 pm
Does 1-4, the "John Doe" case which the RIAA commenced after submitting a notice of dismissal of Warner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
" The problem with these arguments was they did not deal with the means for quashing a subpoena spelled out in Rule 45, which requires a Court to quash a subpoena when the subpoena: (1) does not allow reasonable time to comply; (2) violates certain geographic restrictions; (3) requires disclosure of protected information; or (4) subjects the recipient to undue burden. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Does 1–65, 2010 WL 4055667 (U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
What's with this Kolaveri about John Doe Injunctions? [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:26 am
Does 1-21 (D. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:20 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/OQI9SUDEOv0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:08 pm
Does 1-4. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:56 am
-->Decision dismissing as to Does 1-2, and 4-9*(2008 U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3, John Does 4-10, Ustream TV Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al.CALKINS, J.[ ¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flannery's motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]