Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2016, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
Department of justice Status Report, Judicial Watch Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Internal Revenue Service 13-1269Issue: Whether, contrary to the Federal Circuit's decision in USA Choice Internet Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Docket: 09-871 Issues: (1) Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in affirming the Tax Court’s interpretation of a statute of limitation resulting in judicial expansion of its jurisdiction beyond the scope set by Congress; and (2) whether circuit courts must consider subject matter jurisdiction in their interpretation of a non-jurisdictional statute, thereby expanding jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Gallagher et al.Petitioners' reply Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association Title: Williams v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am by Preston Lim
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ June 23 Conference. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
It may be the Justices are figuring out how to handle the case in light of the closely related petitions in KBR Services, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 21-379, which has been rescheduled twice. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]