Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2016, 12:05 am
Department of justice Status Report, Judicial Watch Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:45 am
The complaint (full text) in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Publishers Business Services, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Internal Revenue Service 13-1269Issue: Whether, contrary to the Federal Circuit's decision in USA Choice Internet Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Docket: 09-871 Issues: (1) Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in affirming the Tax Court’s interpretation of a statute of limitation resulting in judicial expansion of its jurisdiction beyond the scope set by Congress; and (2) whether circuit courts must consider subject matter jurisdiction in their interpretation of a non-jurisdictional statute, thereby expanding jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
Bruce Church, Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
American International Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Gallagher et al.Petitioners' reply Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association Title: Williams v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ June 23 Conference. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
R.I., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
PLIVA, Inc. and Guarino v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
It may be the Justices are figuring out how to handle the case in light of the closely related petitions in KBR Services, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
Viacom International Inc., v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 21-379, which has been rescheduled twice. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]