Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. US DEPARTMENT OF STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 11:03 am by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has filed an open records lawsuit against the City of Phoenix to obtain documents related to Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s taxpayer-funded security detail (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:03 am by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has filed a new memorandum with the Superior Court for the State of Arizona in its legal pursuit of documents related to Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s taxpayer-funded security detail (Judicial Watch, Inc. v City of Phoenix (Civil Action CV2010-015452)). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Record on Appeal
  These documents come to us courtesy of the State’s attorney, Ms. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
United States, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
And that is to say nothing of the grant in Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
That brings us to two related petitions: Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 conference)   Romag Fasteners Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
Google, Inc. 15-849Issue: (1) Whether, in order to be “transformative” under the fair-use exception to copyright, the use of the copyrighted work must produce “new expression, meaning, or message,” as this Court stated in Campbell v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
  New Relists Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Three cases – Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
That brings us to Daniel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
The highest-profile of the bunch is undoubtedly Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]