Search for: "Jack Doe 2 "
Results 1 - 20
of 2,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2007, 3:43 pm
Norm Kent, who is now unofficial legal consultatnt to Dennis McCauley as to all things "Jack" smugly predicted here and elsewhere that this disciplinary blow by Judge Jordan was sure to unravel everything for me.'Now the disciplinary matter does not even exist. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:34 am
Grimaldi, 875 F. 2d 99 (1989) does not apply. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:32 pm
Grimaldi for “expressive” works does not apply to allegedly infringing trademark use; and (2) humor and parody does not constitute “non-commercial use” within the meaning of the Lanham Act’s exclusion from liability for trademark dilution. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 1:14 pm
How does Nick Herbert address this issue, does he attack Jack Straw and the government for the failing? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
The toy replaces the text “Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7” with “Bad Spaniels The Old No. 2,” and generally mimics the black and white design of the label and the square shape of the bottle: Previous decisions in the case have held that the design is a clear parody and therefore does not infringe the Jack Daniel’s trademark and/or trade dress rights. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
The toy replaces the text “Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7” with “Bad Spaniels The Old No. 2,” and generally mimics the black and white design of the label and the square shape of the bottle: Previous decisions in the case have held that the design is a clear parody and therefore does not infringe the Jack Daniel’s trademark and/or trade dress rights. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 9:41 am
United States, Part 2: What to Do If the FSIA Does Not Apply? [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., 953 F.3d 1170, 1175 (9th Cir. 2020). [2] Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., 953 F.3d 1170, 1175 (9th Cir. 2020). [2] Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
2. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 5:46 am
Does immigration, Particularly Increases in Latinos, Affect African American Wages, Unemployment and Incarceration Rates? [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In the words of Justice Elena Kagan: The toy “is about the same size and shape as an ordinary bottle of Jack Daniel’s”; The “faux bottle” follows the original in using a “black label with stylized white text and a white filigreed border”; The toy has the product name (Bad Spaniels) “in a like font and arch” to those of the Jack Daniel’s bottle; and “Old No. 2 On Your Tennessee Carpet” replaces… [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am
VIP’s argument, supported by the weight of numerous academic amici, does not directly engage with the contention by Jack Daniel’s that the First Amendment is not called into play by speech that is confusing. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
Does the "everybody does it" defense work here? [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:47 am
For now, I will say that Jack's watered-down originalism, as I understand it, partly but does not fully meet my objections to originalism, as described in #1. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:28 pm
I agree with Meligan that it absolutely DOES NOT. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
”[2] The Ninth Circuit applied Rogers to dismiss Jack Daniel’s infringement claim out of hand. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
”[2] The Ninth Circuit applied Rogers to dismiss Jack Daniel’s infringement claim out of hand. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am
§ 44-1448.01(C)(2). [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:55 am
" Simply put, the renown of Jack Binion and the Binion family name in the gaming industry does not establish that 'Binion' is no longer perceived as a surname by purchasers, but rather as a service mark for services emanating from applicant. [read post]
