Search for: "Jack Daniels"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 2:22 pm
To continue reading, click: The Jack Daniels Trademark Is in Another Fight [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:07 pm
” To continue reading, click: Jack Daniels Takes on Dog Toy Trademark [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:42 am
” After Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
VIP Products creates a dog toy line called “Silly Squeakers” which are squeaking toys that look like the Jack Daniel’s square-shaped bottle of Old No. 7 Whiskey but replace the Jack Daniel’s wording. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm
The case is Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:28 pm
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 10:20 am
” After Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:34 am
In Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 8:35 am
The post Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel’s dog toy dispute first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:46 pm
The post Poop Jokes, Jack Daniel’s and Trademark appeared first on Plagiarism Today. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:20 am
Complaint Cayman Jack v Jack Daniels [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 3:22 am
The district court found that VIP’s use of Jack Daniel’s trademarks to sell poop-themed dog toys was likely to confuse consumers, infringed Jack Daniel’s marks, and tarnished Jack Daniel’s reputation. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:04 pm
But I strongly doubt that consumers will think that the dog toy is actually produced by Jack Daniels, if for no other reason than (1) "a tag affixed to the Bad Spaniels toy states that the “product is not affiliated with Jack Daniel Distillery,”" and (2) do you really think Jack Daniels itself would produce a product that says "43% poo by volume? [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:30 pm
Recently, the makers of the FIREBALL brand whiskey filed a lawsuit against rival Jack Daniels for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and deceptive trade practices under Kentucky law.[1] The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff is the owner of trademark registrations of the term FIREBALL for use in connection with liquor related products.[2] The Complaint also alleges that […] The post Makers of FIREBALL Whiskey file trademark lawsuit against Jack… [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
At issue in the case was how First Amendment trademark principles should apply to a dog toy that pokes fun at Jack Daniel’s whiskey – a toy the size and shape of a Jack Daniel’s bottle, bearing a familiar-looking label that reads “Bad Spaniels” instead of “Jack Daniel’s. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
ShareThursday’s decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 8:59 pm
The post Supreme Court takes Jack Daniel’s case against dog toy maker first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am
Jack Daniel’s offers a similar argument on the dilution statute. [read post]