Search for: "Jaguar Cars LTD"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2021, 1:34 pm
By enforcing its IP against the replica car market, a car maker may risk damaging its reputation with its core customers but, by allowing infringement to continue, that reputation may in time not be worth much.The Swedish Patent and Market Court's decision in Jaguar Land Rover v Creare Form AB et al, PMT 15833-18The Swedish Patent and Market Court recently decided an interesting copyright case between Jaguar Land Rover Ltd and Swedish… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:10 pm
The case is McBride v UK Insurance Ltd. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
From the recent reappearance of the Rubik's cube (IPKat analysis here), to the KitKat and the London taxi, the list of rejections will certainly intimidate the casual onlooker.Therefore, it came perhaps as no surprise when the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) rejected Jaguar Land Rover's application for the registration of 6 three-dimensional shapes of their cars (pictured) last month. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 4:40 pm
In Quinn, a Mr and Mrs Quinn, who had a Silver Jaguar through a hire-purchase agreement with Black Horse Ltd., approached Car Craft, an automobile dealer, with the intention of purchasing a Red Jaguar in time for their daughter’s wedding, scheduled for 22 July, 2005. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:05 am
The remaining respondents either did not name a maker, were not sure who made the car, thought that the car was a different one made by another maker, or were guessing. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Public Trustee v Butler & Anor [2012] EWHC 858 (Ch) (03 April 2012) DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail) Ltd [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch) (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) J Preston & Sons Ltd [2012] EWHC 870 (QB) (03 April 2012) Letts v Royal Sun Alliance Plc [2012] EWHC 875 (QB) (03 April 2012) The Serious Organised Crime Agency v Robb [2012] EWHC 803 (QB) (30 March 2012) Sharif, R. v [2012] EWHC 868 (QB) (03… [read post]
5 May 2013, 11:01 am
The IPAB dismissing the order stated that Jaguar Cars Ltd. acquired wide reputation and brand value in India since its registration in 1945. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:46 am
Thanks to Jane Lambert and her NIPC Law blog for drawing my attention to Jaguar Land Rover Ltd v Twisted Automotive Ltd [2018] EWHC 3536 (Ch) (20 December 2018) which is a judgment of Rose J in an appeal against the 15 May 2018 (O-289-18) decision of Ms Louise White acting for the Registrar of Trade Marks. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 11:11 am
” Car and Driver. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
International, Inc. of Vance, Alabama Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. of Japan Nissan North America, Inc. of Franklin, Tennessee Dr. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm
Porsche AG of Germany Porsche Cars North America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia Saab Automobile AB of Sweden Saab Cars North America, Inc. of Royal Oak, Michigan Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan American Suzuki Motor Corporation of Brea, California Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC of Mahwah, New Jersey Jaguar Cars Limited of the United Kingdom Land Rover of the United Kingdom Toyota Motor Corporation of Japan Toyota Motor North America, inc. of Torrance,… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:46 pm
[i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Canada Ltd, 2007 FCA 258; Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin v Boutique Cliquot Ltée, 2006 SCC 23 in obiter [i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Cars Limited, 2007 FCA 258 [ii] Section 19 Trademarks Act, RSC 1985, c T‑13 [iii]… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:46 pm
[i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Canada Ltd, 2007 FCA 258; Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin v Boutique Cliquot Ltée, 2006 SCC 23 in obiter [i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Cars Limited, 2007 FCA 258 [ii] Section 19 Trademarks Act, RSC 1985, c T‑13 [iii]… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:46 pm
[i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Canada Ltd, 2007 FCA 258; Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin v Boutique Cliquot Ltée, 2006 SCC 23 in obiter [i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Cars Limited, 2007 FCA 258 [ii] Section 19 Trademarks Act, RSC 1985, c T‑13 [iii]… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:46 pm
[i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Canada Ltd, 2007 FCA 258; Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin v Boutique Cliquot Ltée, 2006 SCC 23 in obiter [i] Remo Imports Ltd v Jaguar Cars Limited, 2007 FCA 258 [ii] Section 19 Trademarks Act, RSC 1985, c T‑13 [iii]… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual Property… [read post]
