Search for: "Jammie Thomas-Rasset"
Results 1 - 20
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset for the third time was found liable for downloading music. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
The third trial of Jammie Thomas-Rasset for downloading and "sharing" songs over the Internet without permission from copyright holders will proceed as scheduled Nov. 2. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:38 am
The third trial of Jammie Thomas-Rasset, whom two separate juries have found liable for using the KazAa peer-to-peer network to download and "share" music, has been set for October 4, 2010, in Minneapolis. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:47 am
Thomas-Rasset, Jammie Thomas-Rasset has filed a motion to suppress all of the MediaSentry evidence, on the ground that it was procured in violation of numerous federal and state criminal laws.The brief cites violations of:-the Minnesota Private Detectives Act;-the federal Pen Register and Trap and Trace Devices Act; and -the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986.The motion is scheduled to be argued June 10th. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:10 am
Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 12:56 am
After the jury returned a verdict finding that Jammie Thomas-Rasset had willfully infringed 30 songs, the record label plaintiffs requested that the court permanently enjoin her from further infringement. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:54 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset, defendant's lawyers have requested a 30-day extension of time in which to file their brief. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:59 am
Thomas-Rasset, the Department of Justice and Jammie Thomas-Rasset have filed further briefs.DOJ Appellee BriefThomas-Rasset Reply Brief var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
DeVoy The United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman famously sued by the RIAA (sub nom Capitol Records) in 2006 during its multi-year litigation campaign. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
DeVoy The United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman famously sued by the RIAA (sub nom Capitol Records) in 2006 during its multi-year litigation campaign. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 3:43 am
Update (July 23, 2011): The prices for (pirated) on-line tunes keeps getting better for Jammie Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 3:32 pm
Thomas-Rasset, the petitioner has filed a reply brief in support of her petition for certiorari.Petitioner's Reply Brief Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Defense called their witness Jammie Thomas-Rasset to testify. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:13 am
Will Justin Gervais, the ex-boyfriend of defendant Jammie Thomas-Rasset, take the stand for the record companies in this trial (which is limited to the issue of damages)? [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:19 am
Thomas-Rasset, the RIAA has filed a brief opposing the grant of certiorari requested by Jammie Thomas-Rasset.RIAA Brief In Opposition to Certiorari Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:56 pm
Thomas-Rasset, defendant has filed a motion to reduce the judgment from $62,500 per song file to zero, due to the absence of any evidence in the record that plaintiffs sustained any actual damage.Defendant's motion to reduce judgmentIn other developments in the case, (a) Prof. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm
Round three in the record labels' copyright suit against Jammie Thomas-Rasset has been moved from Oct. 4 to Nov. 1. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
Thomas-Rasset about her education, degrees she holds, where she works, and some details about what her job duties entail. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm
Several developments in the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset following the third jury's award of $1.5 million to the major record labels in their copyright infringement suit:Thomas-Rasset is seeking to have the award reduced to zero, on constitutional grounds. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:42 am
The judge in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case is considering canceling the third trial in this long-running litigation brought by the major record labels against an individual peer-to-peer user.The parties are preparing for a new trial starting Nov. 2, to focus only on damages, following the court's remittitur of the $1.92 million verdict handed down by a Minneapolis jury in 2009. [read post]
