Search for: "Jane/John Doe 1-14" Results 1 - 20 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Commonly this person is identified as `John Doe’ or `Jane Doe’.The District Court Judge began her opinion by explaining that Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
On the evening of December 14, 2014, Plaintiff John Doe, Jane Roe, and several of Doe’s friends, identified as “K.P” and “A.S. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:03 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.141.132.4Court Case Number: 1:14-cv-00734-TWP-DMLFile Date: Saturday, May 10, 2014Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
IN THE MATTER OF DOE Between October 2001 and September 2009, the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare received eighteen referrals regarding Jane and John Doe and the care of their children. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:12 am by SHG
Jane Doe, a pseudonym, moved to expunge her conviction before Judge John Gleeson in the Eastern District of New York. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am by Sarah Grant
John Doe 1 serves in the Army and, until recently, was preparing to deploy to the Middle East with his unit in mid-2018. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
John Blackstone on comedians Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, a recycle from Sept. 14, 2014 . [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:13 pm by Bob Bauer, Quinta Jurecic
As Jane Chong wrote on Lawfare, “law is the North Star of impeachment discourse. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:42 am
How, then, does he explain the fact that two of the most momentous OLC opinions has ever issued -- the September 25, 2001 Opinion on the President's war powers and the March 14, 2003 opinion informing DOD (over the vociferous objections of numerous DOD lawyers) that its interrogators had virtual carte blanche to ignore federal statutes -- were signed by John Yoo himself (a mere deputy), rather than by the head of OLC (Dan Koffsky in 2001; Jay Bybee in 2003)? [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:55 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Part 2 of the “Two New Privacy Lawsuits Filed” TopicAlso on December 17, 2009, (see prior post about Facebook complaint), a Jane Doe plaintiff and three other individual plaintiffs filed a Class Action Complaint in the Northern District of California against Netflix and John Doe defendants 1-50, alleging violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:01 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
” While the underlying information obtained using the service may be, there is no allegation that any of the information provided by LinkedIn (e.g., “John Doe and Jane Doe may have overlapped at Acme Corporation; contact Jane to find a reference about John”) figured in an employment decision. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
D/B/A METHODIST SPECIALTY AND TRANSPLANT HOSPITAL; JANE OR JOHN DOE(S), HOSPITAL EMPLOYEE(S); AND JANE OR JOHN DOE(S), HOSPITAL NURSE(S); from Bexar County; 4th district (04-05-00868-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-14-06)Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court vacates the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Jane Doe 2, 18-677, and Trump v. [read post]