Search for: "Jane Doe 3" Results 1 - 20 of 1,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 6:18 pm by Jeralyn
Virginia Roberts, aka Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #102, has filed an Affidavit in support of her allegations that she had sex with Alan Dershowitz while she was under the age of 18. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
Alan Dershowitz filed a motion to intervene in the victims rights lawsuit of Jane Does 1, 2 and 3 today. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm by Jeralyn
Both Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew emphatically deny the allegations of sexual activity made by victims rights lawyers for "Jane Does 3 and 4" in a long-pending civil lawsuit against the U.S. arising from DOJ's handling of an investigation... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am by Michael Lowe
Jane Does #3 and #4 File Motion to Join With Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Recently Jane Does #3 and #4 came forward and filed their Joinder Motion in this CVRA lawsuit. [read post]
15 May 2015, 11:37 am
 We used to do 3 Geeks Point/Counter-point posts a couple of years ago? [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:59 am by Jeralyn
I thought I was done with this topic for a few days but there's news: Lawyers for Jane Doe #3 (aka Virginia Roberts), Paul Cassell (pictured above right) and Bradley Edwards (not pictured) have sued Alan Dershowitz for defamation per se in state... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:32 am by Marcia Oddi
John Doe, M.D., Jane Doe, R.N., Kelley Branchfield, R.Ph.,... [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by Amy Howe
The legal battle began last fall, when Jane Doe – a 17-year-old who was then approximately eight weeks pregnant – tried to enter the United States illegally, without any adult family members accompanying her. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:10 am by Jeralyn
The federal judge presiding over the never ending victims rights lawsuit seeking to overturn a federal non-prosecution agreement against Jeffrey Epstein yesterday ruled Jane Doe #3, aka Virginia Roberts, and Jane Doe #4 cannot join Jane Does 1 and... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
Thus, as Jane writes, "[t]he utter isolation of these detainees has been described as essential to America's national security," so that they cannot reveal what happened to them.And what does our formal torture regime consist of? [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm by Margot Patterson
John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) has already received considerable attention for its approach to deterring so-called “copyright trolls”: plaintiffs with “improper motives” who file multitudes of infringement lawsuits to extort quick settlements. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
Jane Lambert A question that I have been asked more than once is "What exactly does a FRAND licence look like? [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 5:48 am by Jeralyn
If not, see my four prior posts on the Dershowitz - Jane Doe claims, accessible here.] [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 4:43 pm
Perhaps the book does a better job of this. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
  Table of Contents   Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:53 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
But my favorite was recently when a wife looked for the first time at a lawsuit that had been filed against her husband, and she asked him, "So who is this Jane Doe, and exactly what is she to you, honey? [read post]