Search for: "John Doe T"
Results 1 - 20
of 22,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 10:20 am
If you don't have Lexis or one of its competitors, the same can be done with Google Scholar case law.Today the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc and reiterated its reasons for the "John Doe. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
She sued the City and John Doe defendants. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:26 am
Blink 182 is playing a concert in Massachusetts on the 9th, and they’re expecting trouble from 100 John Does, 100 Jane Does, and the XYZ company. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
In court proceedings, the names John Doe or Jane Doe -- or John or Jane Roe -- are used as legal placeholders (scroll down) for various reasons. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:22 am
However, John Doe actually does exist in real life. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:08 am
[Watchdog; earlier] Tags: politics, prosecutorial abuse, WisconsinA Wisconsin John Doe question is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:02 am
"And over on the Register under the headline "Smut-spreading copyright trolls lose John Doe case" it's explained that "AF Holdings' last smackdown was in November 2013, when the US District Court of Minnesota found that it hadn't demonstrated ownership of the content claimed in a previous shakedown. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
Does 1-14 (Phoenix, AZ) was turned over one day after John Doe #3 had filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and on the same day that John Doe #8 joined in John Doe #3's motion.We have no idea how this happened, but it would seem that (a) the University of Arizona should not have responded to the subpoena when a motion to quash the subpoena had been filed, and (b) the motions to quash aren't going to be of much use to… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Here, John Doe's argument didn't fall into these exceptions so the Court could not (and did not) quash the subpoena.Motion to quash subpoena, denied.Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:06 pm
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John Does 1-14Cause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge William T. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:07 am
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00669-WTL-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge William T. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:11 am
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00673-WTL-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge William T. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:58 am
March 28, 2008), affirming dismissal orders in three counties involving "John Doe" warrants, warrants based on DNA. [read post]
6 May 2021, 7:20 am
One of the most powerful tools is the John Doe summons. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
P. 20, dismissed as to all John Does except John Doe #1, and ordered the RIAA to file separate new cases against each of the dismissed John Does within 20 days.The judge did not, however, question the sufficiency of the complaint, or the plaintiffs' showing of a need for ex parte discovery. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 10:05 am
I don’t fault John Deere for protecting its intellectual property. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:37 pm
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John Does 1-4Cause: Direct Copyright Infringement, Contributory Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge William T. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
John Doe I, supra. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:04 am
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00204-WTL-MJDFile Date: Tuesday, February 05, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:05 am
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00205-WTL-MJDFile Date: Tuesday, February 05, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
