Search for: "John Does 1 - 3" Results 1 - 20 of 9,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
Does 1-14 (Phoenix, AZ) was turned over one day after John Doe #3 had filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and on the same day that John Doe #8 joined in John Doe #3's motion.We have no idea how this happened, but it would seem that (a) the University of Arizona should not have responded to the subpoena when a motion to quash the subpoena had been filed, and (b) the motions to quash aren't going to… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am by Patent Arcade Staff
John Does 1-50United States District Court for N.D. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Woodrow Pollack
John Doe anonymously filed a motion to quash the subpoena, arguing that: (1) the ISP can't identify the actual infringer, it can only identify whomever pays for the IP address; (2) such techniques by plaintiffs like Malibu are "Bad Investigation Techniques;" and (3) identifying the information allows "Plaintiff to Pursue Abusive Litigation. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2 1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion:November 17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
John Does 1-5United States District Court for N.D. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:03 am by Ron Coleman
John Doe 1, in which Doe does not appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Does 1-11, the District Court has granted the defendant John Doe #9's motion for severance, and severed as to Doe #9 and all other defendants except John Doe #1.District Judge Kathleen O'Malley rejected the RIAA's argument that severance was premature, agreed with the authorities that had granted severance, and dismissed the authorities cited by the RIAA as providing insufficient analysis, explanation, or… [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:14 am
A George Washington University student, known only as "John Doe #3", has made a motion to vacate the RIAA's ex parte discovery order, quash the subpoena issued pursuant to the order, and to dismiss the complaint, in Arista v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:24 am
" It claims that "John Doe" has infringed 67 separate copyrighted works owned by Malibu Media. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:03 am
Does 1-16, a "John Doe" case targeting students at the State University of New York at Albany, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued a stay of the RIAA subpoena and all proceedings during the pendency of John Doe #3's appeal.This is a case in which several John Does had moved to quash the subpoena, vacate the ex parte discovery order, and dismiss the complaint.The motion to vacate,… [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 8:57 pm
Doe's attorney, Earl McCoy of Lafayette, questioned the logic of the law, which took effect July 1, 2006. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has granted an interim stay of the subpoena calling for the identity of student "John Doe #3". [read post]