Search for: "John Does 10" Results 1 - 20 of 10,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 6:13 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-10 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01291-RLY-DML File Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:56 am
Does 1-10, John Doe #4 has made a motion to dismiss the Linares declaration, dismiss the complaint, and quash the subpoena. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 3:13 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court has driven the final nail in the coffin of Wisconsin’s politically driven John Doe investigation. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:50 pm
Does 1-5, the case pending in the Western District of Michigan targeting students at Northern Michigan University, pro se litigant John Doe #5 has moved for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order denying his motion to vacate and to quash.Defendant John Doe #5's Motion for Reconsideration*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->-->… [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:16 am
Does 1-14.John Doe #10 has made motions to (a) strike the declaration of Carlos Linares bases on the illegality of MediaSentry's unlicensed investigatory activity, and (b) vacate ex parte discovery order and quash subpoena.The papers, drafted by Portland, Maine, lawyer Bob Mittel, made the following point about the RIAA's professed need for "ex parte" procedures and circumvention of the Rule 26(f) discovery conference:As pointed out above,… [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:06 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-14 Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-01629-WTL-DMLFile Date: Friday, October 11, 2013Plaintiff: TCYK, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:02 pm
As it usually does once it obtains its response to the subpoena in its John Doe cases, the RIAA has voluntarily dismissed without prejudice its Portland, Oregon, case targeting students at the University of Oregon, Arista Records v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
  The judge then explains that [u]nder Local Civil Rule 7–10, Uber certifies that it attempted to identify John Doe I without success. . . . [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
  Here, presumably, the plaintiff will subpoena to eBay to discover the identity of "John Doe." [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:33 am
Does 1-11, the case which targets Oklahoma State University students, "John Does" have made a motion to strike the RIAA's papers, and dismiss the complaint, based upon the RIAA's "contemptuous behavior" in disregard of the Court's rules and a Court order. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 10:18 am by JAntonelli
John Doe Case Filings – September 2018 appeared first on Torrent Defenders. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:37 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-10, back in August, District Judge Edgardo Ramos severed and dismissed all cases against John Does other than Does numbered 1. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 9:34 am by Walter Olson
Earlier on the Wisconsin John Doe raids, including this Cato piece. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:58 pm by Ray Beckerman
John Does 1-10, the Court has granted the motions of several defendants to sever, to dismiss the complaints, and to quash the subpoena.April 19, 2013, Opinion and Order, Hon. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:39 pm
10-15-2008 National:It appears that some citizens have uploaded videos of various political messages made by John McCain's campaign for presidency to the popular YouTube site.Following that there have been complaints (likely from news organizations) that those videos violate DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) law, and as a result, YouTube has removed those videos or shortened them to 10 seconds or so. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:27 am by The White Law Group
Broker John Hoidas Suspended after 10 Customer Complaints The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has reportedly suspended financial advisor John Hoidas for 18 months and fined him $40,000 after numerous customers alleged unsuitable investment recommendations. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:46 pm
The departure of a sandwich-making employee to a similar business does not seem to fall into any of the exceptions to California's prohibition on noncompetes.I have blogged about some of Jimmy John's previous legal travails here. [read post]